Buckingham Palace concludes report on Meghan’s harassment – but won’t say what’s in it

Buckingham Palace concludes report on Meghan’s harassment – but won’t say what’s in it

Speaking at a news conference to discuss the royal family’s annual financial statement, Michael Stevens – the Crown Prince’s chief financial officer – said the private company hired to investigate the allegations had completed its work. .

Stevens said many suggestions have been made, but he did not elaborate on what conclusions have been reached or what suggestions have been made. As the review was privately funded, there was little pressure for the Crown to publish its findings.

“I can confirm, however, that this was a review of the handling of the allegations, which aims to address possible improvements in the royal family’s human rights policies and procedures,” Stevens said. “The review has been completed and recommendations on our policies and procedures have been made, but we will not comment further.”

A senior royal source said the palace remained silent on the investigation to secure the names of those who had cooperated.

The source said: “We understand that the people who took part in the review participated in this agreement under an understanding that there would be confidentiality in these negotiations with an independent legal firm, and therefore we have a duty to ensure that confidentiality. Respect you. “

The source said the palace had made several changes to the policy after the meeting, but declined to give details.

“When you do an independent review or have a test of this nature, there will always be lessons to be learned, there are always ways you can improve processes and procedures,” the source said. “We will not normally disclose any changes in our policies and procedures.”

The allegations surfaced last year, when the Times in the UK published an article citing unnamed sources claiming that the Duchess had expelled two personal assistants from her Kensington Malace family and damaged the trust of a third employee.
Buckingham Palace initially said it would investigate the allegations, but later hired a foreign law firm to do so.
At the time, a Sussex spokesman dismissed the Times report as a “calculated smear campaign,” as it was just a few days before the Opera Winfrey bombing interview with Meghan and Prince Harry was published.

The interview was the first time the pair had spoken publicly since they announced plans to withdraw from senior roles in the British royal family in 2020.

Meghan told Winfrey’s life that life as a British monarch was so isolated and lonely that he “didn’t want to be alive anymore.” She described herself as a victim of a Buckingham Palace photo shoot, which showed how dark her son Archie’s skin color was and how long he would go to lunch with friends.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.