Because misinformation has flourished during the pandemic

Nature Human Behaviour (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41562-022-01353-3″>

Nature Human Behavior (2022). DOI: 10.1038 / s41562-022-01353-3 “width =” 800 “height =” 462 “/>

Temporal behavior of search and news fractions from all sources in Italy. Searches (red, left y axis) and News from all sources (blue, right y axis) for the keyword “coronavirus” were recorded from December 6, 2019 to August 31, 2020. Searches are reported as a percentage of the maximum observed in the monitoring period. News from all sources is represented by the daily fraction of articles containing at least three keyword impressions (see Methods). The enhanced model (black line) utilizes past news from all sources and searches, along with current searches, to infer the dynamics of News from All Sources. Credit: Nature Human Behavior (2022). DOI: 10.1038 / s41562-022-01353-3

A small group of researchers at Sony Computer Science Laboratories in France investigated why misinformation seemed to flourish during the global pandemic. In their work published in the journal Nature Human Behavior, Pietro Gravino, Giulio Prevedello, Martina Galletti and Vittorio Loretom examined the supply and demand of COVID-19 news during the pandemic and compared the way in which news agencies responded.

One of the most striking features of the global pandemic is the seemingly uninterrupted stream of misinformation attributed not only to the virus and people infected, but to the way the medical community has responded to the threat. From ridiculous claims about supposed treatments to baseless claims made by anti-vaxxers, misinformation has flourished. In this new endeavor, researchers wondered why this happens and looked at news sources, credible and unreliable, as participants in a supply and demand news ecosystem.

The work involved examining the problem in Italy – they began by obtaining articles published by Italian media sources in a public database. They also retrieved information from another article database published by data control teams, which helped them differentiate news sources based on their reliability. All these items were the supply side of the system.

To learn more about pandemic information search, researchers looked at Google search trends. To compare news supply and demand, the researchers looked at searches performed by information seekers and compared them with the answers available from news sources. The researchers found that those news sources that were identified as generally unreliable tended to respond more quickly to new information than to more traditional and reliable sources.

The researchers were unable to determine why unreliable news sources were able to respond more quickly, but suggested that the end result was higher visibility for unreliable sources, with widespread misinformation gaining traction and eventual acceptance.


Does presenting credibility labels to news sources affect news consumption? New study finds limited results


More information:
Pietro Gravino et al, Supply and demand of news during COVID-19 and evaluation of the production of disputed sources, Nature Human Behavior (2022). DOI: 10.1038 / s41562-022-01353-3

© 2022 Science X Network

Reference: Why misinformation has flourished during the pandemic (2022, May 25) Retrieved May 26, 2022 from https://phys.org/news/2022-05-disinformation-flourished-pandemic.html

This document is subject to copyright. Except for any fair transaction for the purposes of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without our written permission. Content is provided for informational purposes only.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.